Archives

  • Children, Youth and Environment
    Vol. 32 No. 2 (2022)

    Inside this issue, you will find diverse scholarly work that spans across the globe. We first stop in Vancouver where Hutton and coauthors analyzed interview data with children ages 10–13 to identify seven design principles for urban public landscapes thatsupport play for tweens. Next, we make our way across the Atlantic and arrive in the Netherlands where van Tol and coauthors investigated 11-and 12-year old’s nature connectedness to reveal that although children enjoy being in nature, they lack emotional affection toward the natural world and possess human-centric images of nature. We then head west, back to North America, to California where Dahl and Cushing revealed that garden-based pedagogies had significant, positive impacts on fourth graders’ environmental literacy, especially pro-environmental awareness, attitude and behavior. Hopping over to Texas, Hite and White examined Hispanic fourth and fifth grade students’ knowledge, understanding, and agency throughout a year-long after-school club on endangered marine species and oceanic conservation to reveal knowledge gains and reported perceptions of agency. Heading north, we arrive back in Vancouver where Bauer and coauthors explored how natural environments shaped the experiences of 10–13-year-olds and influenced their development of microcultures to develop two overarching themes: (1) children played in natural environments to which they had sentimental attachments; and (2) children developed microcultures away from adults. For our last stop on our global adventure, we head to the southern hemisphere and arrive in Australia. Here, Green examines youth, ages 9–17 years, perspectives about transition and climate change adaptation in regional Gippsland, Victoria to reveal four main themes: (1) youth values, (2) perceptions of energy, transition and adaptation, (3) the enabling role of climate literacy for youth; and (4) responding to a just transition through collective endeavors. We continue with The Place of Children: Poverty and Promise, a paper in which van Vliet--reviews a project from 2008-09 that raised awareness of the challenges faced by children among the urban poor worldwide and recognized their contributions to their families and communities. In the paper, van Vliet--provides updates on those who participated in the ethnographic fieldwork. This issue also includes a report from the field where Beeth and coauthors share their experience with an instructional activity that engaged preservice elementary teachers in understanding the natural world through phenology –directed observation of the natural world that builds conscious awareness of and connections with a natural area. We wrap this issue with two book reviews: Yeo’s review of Public Space Readeredited by Miodrag Mitrašinović and Vikas Mehta, and Chawla’s review of Schools That Heal: Design with Mental Health in Mindby Claire Latané. Happy reading!

    Once again, we would like to remind our readers that we are delighted to announce that Children Youth and Environments has signed a new deal with University of Cincinnati Press (https://ucincinnatipress.uc.edu). Our backlist will continue to be available through JSTOR. The University of Cincinnati Press is committed to publishing rigorous, peer-reviewed, leading scholarship accessibly tostimulate dialog between the academy, public intellectuals and lay practitioners. The Press works with authors and editors to erase disciplinary to address common problems in our global community.UC Press looks for projects across the humanities, social sciences and STEM fields focusing on social justice and community engagement.

  • Cover of Children, Youth and Environments, Volume 32, number 1

    Vol. 32 No. 1 (2022)

    Inside this first of two special issues on COVID-19, you will find an array of research article, field reports, a media review and a position paper that span across the globe. These articles, field reports and position paper present both sides of the outcomes of the pandemic on the lives of children and youth. They present the challenges ahead regarding learning, mental health and overall wellbeing for the young, as well as the opportunities for finding new ways to address the same, as many have done by coping in these most difficult circumstances. DiGiacomo and coauthors present the findings from a youth participatory action research (YPAR) study that focused on the students’ learning-from-home experiences in the wake of COVID-19 state-wide school closures in Kentucky, US. Next, reporting on a rapid assessment conducted by UNICEF, Chatterjee, Jobin, and Dutta present the global impact of COVID-19 on vulnerable children in urban areas in Brazil, India and Spain, where UNICEF is actively engaged in urban programming. On the positive side, Moore, Morrissey and Jeavons, reporting the use of outdoor spaces in Melbourne, Australia, observe an increased presence of children and play activity in the local natural spaces. Similarly, de Lannoy and coauthors present the findings of a Canada-wide environmental scan of outdoor play-based child and youth projects, programs, activities and services available during the height of the pandemic (2020-2021). The article by Martz, Powell and Wee covers the various spatial restrictions for youth as a result of the lockdowns and explores how youth related with nature during this time. In the final article in this issue, Seixas and co-authors explore the impact of the drastic
    reduction in tourism due to the pandemic on children’s play in an urban park in a highly touristic, commercial and increasingly gentrified neighbourhood in Lisbon, Portugal.

    The position paper by Bishop and co-authors—members of the Children, Youth and Environments (CYE) Working Group (WG) of the Sustainable Cities and Landscapes Research Hub of the Association of Pacific Rim Universities (APRU) that includes members from Canada, USA, Australia, and New Zealand—discusses both the positive and negative impacts of COVID-19 and identifies areas for change with impact on the lives of children and young people and their environmental experience in Canada, USA, Australia, and New Zealand. The first field report by Stinehart and co-authors showcases the nimbleness and creativity of educators in response to the pandemic. The second field report by Garratt and co-authors presents stories of therapists from the United States and the United Kingdom who provide early intervention services to infants and young children who qualify with a disability or developmental delay. The issue concludes with a media review by Catherine Rita Volpe of This Podcast Will Kill You, COVID-19, Chapter 10: Schools by Erin Welsh and Erin Allman Updyke.

  • Vol. 31 Number 3 2021

    Children Youth and Environments
    Vol. 31 No. 3 (2021)

    Inside this issue, you will find diverse scholarly work that spans across the globe. First, Schoeppich and co-authors critically review 14 studies focusing on children’s participation in playground creation to reveal gaps, inconsistencies and benefits associated with child participation. Next, we arrive in a small rural town in Upstate New York where Andrews investigated a 7-year-old girl’s conceptions of what counts as science in an everyday context. Expanding our regional focus, we visit New York state as well as, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington D.C. where Ibes and co-authors conduct intensive semi-structured interviews of local community leaders and leaders of nature-oriented organizations to enhance understanding of the barriers to nature engagement by YOC. Crossing the globe, we arrive in Iran where Manouchehri and co-authors investigated school children’s views of favorable and unfavorable attributes of their neighborhood environments. Heading South, we arrive in Porto Alegre in Brazil where Rosa and co-authors interviewed healthcare experts to identify interventions that would respond to children's needs, and architecture and mental health experts assessed their potential to improve children’s PWB to reveal that the hospital environment may stimulate all components of PWB, especially environmental mastery, personal growth, and self-acceptance. At our final stop, we head back the United States where Pic and Han explored peer conflict among preschoolers during indoor and outdoor free play in a nature-based preschool to reveal that outdoor nature environment seems to provide children more meaningful conflict situations around play ideas rather than the mere possession of material. A position paper by Gecker and co-authors helps us with understanding youth civic engagement in the aftermath of a mass shooting in Parkland. The issue continues with three reports from the field. First, Burnett and Edgeley describe ways to overcome barriers to outdoor education. Next, Tarr o describes the interactions between children and pocket parks. Then, Gravil and co-authors describe the use of citizen science and technology to connect preschool classrooms at two universitybased programs. We wrap this issue with two book reviews: Chawla’s review of The Necessity of Urban Green Space for Children’s Optimal Development: A Discussion Paper by Suchitra Sugar, and Maclure’s review of The Youngest Citizens: Children’s Rights in Latin America, by Amy Risley. Happy reading!